leave comments Posted July 30, 2015 by nobelief I plan on turning comments off on all pages accept this one… I like hearing from people but don’t like the comment form loading with every page 23 Comments mmfiore December 21st, 2009 Einstein was right about the shortcomings of Quantum Mechanics and so therefore String Theory is also the incorrect approach. As an alternative to Quantum Theory there is a new theory that describes and explains the mysteries of physical reality. While not disrespecting the value of Quantum Mechanics as a tool to explain the role of quanta in our universe. This theory states that there is also a classical explanation for the paradoxes such as EPR and the Wave-Particle Duality. The Theory is called the Theory of Super Relativity. See superrelativity.org. This theory is a philosophical attempt to reconnect the physical universe to realism and deterministic concepts. It explains the mysterious. Doug Wilson December 21st, 2009 What I like about the electric universe model is 1) I can see it, 2) It’s testable, they’ve made prediction and “say” it’s panned out. I started to read all the quantum physics stuff. Then I saw I needed to learn about something else before I could go forward. Pretty soon I figured I’d have to start “way” back if I wanted to get the terminology. Then I started having trouble with time and space time – it just didn’t make sense – At that point I slowed way down and finally stopped looking for simpler explanations that I could fathom. Do you have predictions? Tests you can run? I’ve always figured if somethings there – it’s there. How does it work with plasma cosmology? We know there’s Plasma. For sure there is electromagnetism. What else…needs to be in there? James Circello January 3rd, 2010 I want to stress the importance of a political program and the demands it makes. These demands are not being made to the institution itself. These demands are being made to the enlisted ranks, to the veterans that have fallen victim to this assault, to the service members that recognize the truth – the the U.S. military is not a force for spreading democracy, but a force which upholds markets and defends resources for the ruling class in the United States. So, while I thank you for your support of our program, I feel you are completely off base with your attack on it as being aimed at an institution. March Forward! recognizes that no military officer will decide to disband the officer corps. We also recognize that no politician will legislate an end to these wars. This is why we do not lobby. We do not knock on the doors of Congress and ask for these changes, but knock on the doors of the working class and soldiers in general to show what we can have when we stop begging the system and take them, This is why our 10 Point Program is presented to the world – not as a please, but as a demand. James Circello March Forward! arcadianal January 18th, 2010 No left-wing bias in this piece, is there? Is the university pseudo-intellectual and MSM establishment feeling some heat from people who are wary of Orwell’s Big Brother? So, Volker’s data is missing? Welcome to Climategate! The left is very good at obfuscating. And you feel threatened by the “reactionaries”, when the 100s of billions residing in the universities’ endowments, most of the charitable institutions’ coffers and George Soros’s bank account are all working to perpetuate your propaganda? Come, you’re winning already. If you’re opposed to reactionaries, how do you feel about Obama’s unconstitutional czars, one would-be of whom characterized those who disagreed with him as you did: a$$holes. Small minds think alike. Cheer up–you’ll get your one-world government and moment in the sun. But trust me, you won’t like it. Chip April 20th, 2010 Keep your fingers crossed and hope Monsanto doesn’t find a weak link to pressure. Somebody keep an eye on Donald Rumsfeld, por favor tambien. =c= http://www.thefutureoffood.com/ Check out “The Future of Food” for some interesting stuff. Skateboardkid July 4th, 2010 Thanks Doug for all that you are doing. I always feel that after I write, that it all looks and sounds terrible. I need lots of practice, and I guess this would be a good time to tell you that it is wonderful that you let me practice here. I really like the topics you have covered for the past couple of weeks. Where others are stuck on one topic, you on the other hand, cover an array of things (all relevant, on topic with the times). Thanks for helping all us out. Tonight I felt really hopeless about all this, and felt reaching out with my feelings may help not just me, but maybe others also feel the way I do and want to speak. I am not talking to “get things off my chest”, I am writing to find brothers in arms who want to do something about our problems. Thanks again, I hear fireworks outside and wondering what we really have right now worth celebrating. But soon, we all will have something worth popping fireworks for, maybe it will be the day we all see hope with our efforts. Timothy Leary – Wikiquote, My advice to myself and to everyone else, particularly young people, is to turn on, tune in and drop out. By drop out, I mean to detach yourself from involvement in secular, external social games. But the dropping out has to occur internally before it can occur externally. I’m not telling kids just to quit school; I’m not telling people to quit their jobs. That is an inevitable development of the process of turning on and tuning in. Cinn Fields August 22nd, 2010 In addition to ic.org, I’d recommend that you read either of Diana Leafe Christian’s books, for example Finding Community: How to Join an Ecovillage or Intentional Community. Unfortunately one of the most common things about intentional communities is that they are short-lived, often succeeding on physical aspects but not the social interactions necessary to survive and thrive as a group. I think one of the reasons why our intentional community has lasted is that on a human scale it is often more important to place people and human relationships above “progress.” Doug Wilson February 26th, 2011 Read this: Sheldon Richman is the editor of The Freeman and TheFreemanOnline.org, and a contributor to The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. He is the author of Tethered Citizens. … https://fee.org/articles/wisconsin-labor-brouhaha/ JFCost February 27th, 2011 Agree on so much of this – and what a huge list of products these greedy giants have their hands into. But, I still believe, gasoline is their biggest money maker. The most common and most used commodity and one they can jack the prices up on so quickly and easily. You’re very right – we all need to do our homework, load up our tool boxes, and get to work on this! Thanks for a good start! clint May 6th, 2011 I understand you cannot beleive everything the press says in any country. I beleive the Osama story is the same. This country using our resources the wrong way as they do, probably captured interrogated then killed and buried him. On the other hand I have Christian values close to me and wonder why this author uses quotes from Dr. King with faith in mind for his closing statues. Doug Wilson May 22nd, 2011 Lawrence, I’m a retired Piledriver too – I was wondering, as an inventor, if you’d looked into Benini or Stumblefeild, Tesla, “Energy from the vacuum” electricity stuff. Here’s Tom Bearden’s url – https://www.cheniere.org/toc.html Lawrence Baker May 22nd, 2011 Doug, Thanks for the link to Tom Bearden’s web site, he and his associate are other great inventors who are capable of thinking outside the box. I will read up on their achievements and theory’s. Asymmetric electrical power systems are the energy wave of the future if somehow humanity has a future. First, the corporate Oligarchy Fascist must be curbed before science can advance or maybe if science can advance first; science will curb the Fascist. Advancement in science to outmode fossil fuels is what the Oligarchy fear the most. Doug Wilson May 22nd, 2011 Can’t remember who said it, but the saying goes, “The problem with all institutions is there’s people involved”. Lawrence Baker May 22nd, 2011 My apology for taking up so much room on this post but this is important information to fight the corporate Oligarchy Fascist and their pervasive disinformation propaganda. Understand these 25 rules of propaganda disinformation in order to disarm the Fascist enemy and their lies. 1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues. 2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit. 3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact. 4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues. 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. 6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint. 7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive. 8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources. 9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect. 10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source. 11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues. 12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues. 13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact. 14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10. 15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place. 16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue. 17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues. 18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”. 19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance. 20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications. 21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. 22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively. 23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes. 24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats. 25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen. These are the propaganda tactics the main stream media uses, once you know their tactics, you can defuse them and attack them. Doug Wilson May 22nd, 2011 “My apology for taking up so much room on this post…”. No problem, write all you want. Have fun Barbara Metzler May 28th, 2011 SourceURL:file:///Mini/Barbara%20Files/Nutrasweet/I%20have%20studied%20aspartame6.doc I have studied aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal) for more than 25 years because it caused a drastic personality change and intellectual deterioration in my daughter. She also developed epileptic-type seizures and began to lose the vision in both eyes. She consulted a neurologist, and he told her that she had temporal lobe epilepsy. He began treating her with medication, but the medication didn’t work, because the doctor was wrong in his diagnosis and he was treating her for a condition she didn’t have! What she really had was a reaction to ASPARTAME I heard about Dr. H. J. Roberts in Florida, so I contacted him and he confirmed what I suspected – that she was suffering from a reaction to the artificial sweetener in diet soda. He has written many medical texts about aspartame. To follow up, we took our daughter to Boston for special studies on her brain, and the doctors confirmed that it was the NutraSweet that had made her so sick. They said that she had been totally misdiagnosed by the neurologist and that she did not have temporal lobe epilepsy at all. (These men were in the Clinical Research Center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.). We also took her to a highly-respected ophthalmologist who explained why her vision loss was due to aspartame. She finally stopped drinking sodas containing aspartame, and she had a complete recovery and has had a fine job since then as a computer programmer and financial analyst. My daughter drank only one can of diet soda a day. I react with a classic migraine after a few sips of diet soda. Aspartame causes many documented problems in so many people. Jeanie Mccaskey July 1st, 2011 Hi , may you be rich and help other people. Charles Billiter August 23rd, 2011 Keep up the good fight. Maree MacLean December 6th, 2011 Thanks for your clarification on the laws of autonomic response testing and your explanation on how they work. Is there any chance you can recommend a good book which teaches the art of ART to newbies like me? It would be helpful to have a means to test the Autonomic nervous system for imbalance and then pinpoint the cause. Thanks. Maree wilson6 December 6th, 2011 It’s been so long since I’ve looked at autonomic response testing I can’t give a good recommendation but here’s some video and you can readily proceed from there – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wvvTx8FoBg Ashley May 9th, 2012 If I will get t any site or a blog like “moms for safe food” am surely gonna add at your reference directory.I am with you and do everything possible.We should take strict action ya IT’S TIME FOR A FOOD FIGHT. Linda Dumas April 19th, 2013 My Daughter has had Schizoaffective Disorder for 13 years, it has been detrimental to her health, I would do anything to be able to cure her or at least try. I need to know if it is possible and how much and what kinds of vitamin therapy to give her. We have changed our diet to Vegan around the first of the year, The Dr.s have almost killed her by OD of Clozapine she was going extremely crazy for a couple of years, finally they took her Clozapine level, it was supposed to be between 200 and 700 and it was 1,275. We have gotten that level back down but she lost a lot as far as skills because of it, also Is slurring her words worse because of it. She is also developmentally slow, which doesn’t help matters any. Please let me know if their is a book to purchase or what I need to do in order to be able to help her. I am her caretaker and would do anything to help her. Thank you, Linda Dumas dgswilson April 20th, 2013 I’ll give you what I have, so far. Below are some places I used to find things out. I will say that I see two main causes of health problems. There is the reactive type: allergic or toxin reactions (GMO’s, pesticides, additives…). And the out of balance and deficiency type. That “food pyramid” is not what I use. For Mineral balance I use this company: https://traceminerals.com/ For diet I follow “The Macrobiotic Way” By Michio Kushi, Stephen Blauer, Wendy Esko Sites I use: https://www.naturalpedia.com/ https://www.ihealthtube.com/ http://www.orthomolecular.org/ (tons of articles, studies and research) http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_paradigm.html (this page is on Dr. Hoffer) https://breggin.com/ (I just found this recently, seems to have good info) Comments are closed.