I woke up this morning thinking about what Ingo Swan said about remote viewing. That remote viewing is a human technology. He said we all have the ability and it’s a co-function of the brain.
Remote viewing was well documented and well funded. I remembered he said something about the moon and why we’re not going back there – he said, “There’s stuff there… and it’s not our stuff”.
A lot of esoteric ideas at mara-gamiel.blogspot.com , read A LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS: Who Built The Moon?
Lost pyramids, ancient artifacts, alien skulls, anomalous objects…
(I love this shit!!)
Christopher Knight and Alan Butler, the moon is artificial and deliberately engineered to sustain life on Earth. The moon is precisely designed “like a Swiss Clock,” and built to a “mathematical blueprint,” said Butler.
The material the moon is made out of came from the surface layers of the Earth
A highly advanced in technology, could have spotted our planet as a likely place for seeding life, and left their calling card (an obviously artificial moon) – Or – Human time travelers created the moon at some stage in the future, realizing that this needed to be done to incubate humanity in the past.
They believe that the time traveler explanation is the most valid. Humans would have the highest degree of interest in carrying out such a monumental task, said Butler, and time travel appears to be increasingly a real possibility, added Knight.
Alan Butler has a special interest in ancient civilizations and history. His work has been geared towards uncovering mysteries from the past. An expert in astrology and astronomy, Alan has worked hard over the years to gain an understanding of the great importance ancient civilizations put upon the stars and planets, both in a practical and a mythological sense.
The origin of the Moon is one of the most complicated problems of cosmogony. So far there have been basically three hypotheses under discussion.
HYPOTHESIS I: The Moon was once a part of the Earth and broke away from it. This has now been refuted by the evidence. HYPOTHESIS II: The Moon was formed independently from the same cloud of dust and gas as the Earth, and immediately became the Earth’s natural satellite. But then why is there such a big difference between the specific gravity of the Moon (3.33 grams per cubic centimeter) and that of the Earth (5.5 gr.)? Furthermore, according to the latest information (analysis of samples brought back by the U.S. Apollo astronauts) lunar rock is not of the same composition as the Earth’s.
HYPOTHESIS III: The Moon came into being separately, and, moreover, far from the Earth (perhaps even outside the Solar system). This would mean that the moon would not have to be fashioned from the same “clay” as our own planet. Sailing through the Universe, the Moon came into Earth’s proximity, and by a complex interplay of forces of gravity was brought within a geocentric orbit, very close to circular. But a catch of this kind is virtually impossible. In fact, scientists studying the origin of the Universe today have no acceptable theory to explain how the Earth-Moon system came into being. OUR HYPOTHESIS: The Moon is an artificial Earth satellite put into orbit around the Earth by some intelligent beings unknown to ourselves.
I don’t know anything about the moon, except that it’s there… I just like looking at all this stuff.